Professor Jacob Charles, “'A Map Is Not the Territory': The Theory and Future of Sensitive Places Doctrine" -- NYU Law Review Online
Professor Jacob D. Charles's article, “'A Map Is Not the Territory': The Theory and Future of Sensitive Places Doctrine," is published in the New York University Law Review Online. The article, co-authored with Joseph Blocher and Darrell A.H. Miller, considers the development of the sensitive places doctrine following the Supreme Court's decision in New York Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.
Introduction to “'A Map Is Not the Territory': The Theory and Future of Sensitive Places Doctrine"
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, courts are now confronted with new questions about where guns can be restricted and what justifications support those regulations. This Essay urges that the development of the doctrine governing location-based prohibitions should focus as much on the why as the where. Instead of simply isolating each location and considering the historical pedigree of gun restrictions in that place, judges should evaluate the reasons behind the sensitive places doctrine itself. We aim to recenter these first order questions to avoid haphazard doctrinal development that threatens to leave Second Amendment law incoherent and unpredictable.
Judges developing the doctrine will need to avoid several hazards. Among them: pitching historical analogies too narrowly, neglecting sensitive location mobility, and excessively focusing on locational features rather than regulatory justifications. Whatever values ultimately underpin the doctrine, they should direct the shape of location-based challenges. Whether the doctrine is grounded in safeguarding the exercise of other constitutional rights, protecting the vulnerability of specific populations, recognizing the inhibited judgment or discretion of those gathered, or other values altogether, this Essay shows why justificatory and constitutional foundations must be set before the doctrinal structure is completely built.
The article may be found at New York University Law Review