Facebook pixel Who Let the Ghouls Out? The History and Tradition Test’s Embrace of Neutrality and Pluralism in Establishment Cases | Volume 51 | Issue 2 | Pepperdine Law Review Skip to main content
Pepperdine Law Review

Who Let the Ghouls Out? The History and Tradition Test’s Embrace of Neutrality and Pluralism in Establishment Cases

Jake S. Neill

 

Abstract

In June of 2022, the Supreme Court decided in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District that an Establishment Clause inquiry “focused on original meaning and history” would replace Lemon’s endorsement test. But after announcing the test, the Court neglected to describe or apply it.

This Comment attempts to fill that void. After analyzing the Court’s Establishment Clause jurisprudence, this Comment proposes tenets of the history and tradition test and applies those tenets to Allegheny County v. ACLU, a case decided under Lemon. Finally, this Comment concludes by arguing that the history and tradition inquiry supports pluralism, humility, tolerance, and a healthy separation of church and state.